For decades, the pitch was simple: per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances made things work better. Firefighting foam that smothered jet-fuel fires in seconds. Food wrappers that kept grease off your hands. Outdoor jackets that laughed at rainstorms. The fluorine-carbon bond — one of the strongest in organic chemistry — was the secret ingredient behind all of it.
The problem, of course, is that the same bond that makes PFAS so effective makes them nearly indestructible. They accumulate in blood, soil, and groundwater. They show up in the breast milk of women who've never worked in a factory. And cleaning them up once they've escaped into the environment costs billions.
But something remarkable is happening across American industry right now: companies and researchers aren't just figuring out how to destroy PFAS after the fact. They're eliminating the need for them entirely. The result is a wave of fluorine-free alternatives — in firefighting, food packaging, outdoor apparel, and industrial chemistry — that are proving the forever chemical era doesn't have to last forever.
The Foam That Didn't Need Fluorine
Few PFAS applications carried higher stakes than aqueous film-forming foam, or AFFF — the firefighting foam used at military bases, airports, and petrochemical facilities worldwide. AFFF works by spreading a thin film over burning hydrocarbon fuel, cutting off oxygen supply. It saved countless lives. It also contaminated the groundwater beneath virtually every military base and commercial airport where it was used.
The 2020 National Defense Authorization Act gave the Department of Defense a clear mandate: phase out AFFF by October 1, 2024, with the possibility of two one-year extensions. The DoD published a new military specification — MIL-PRF-32725 — establishing the standard for fluorine-free foam, or F3. The spec is rigorous: any qualifying foam must contain less than 1 part per billion of PFAS and achieve a non-detect laboratory result for fluorinated compounds.
The Air Force committed $8.55 million to purchase more than 270,000 gallons of F3, with overseas installations receiving the new foam first. Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida began receiving F3 in early 2024. The FAA, which oversees firefighting at Part 139 certificated airports, has published a transition plan allowing airports to use F3 products once they appear on the DoD's Qualified Products List.
The chemistry behind F3 replaces fluorosurfactants with hydrocarbon surfactants — sulfates, sulfonates, and betaines — combined with protein-based foaming agents derived from hydrolyzed proteins and polysaccharides. These formulations can meet performance standards like EN 1568 and ICAO Level B without a single fluorine atom. A 2024 review in PMC notes that F3 products are now viable for most municipal and many industrial applications, with constraints mainly for the largest hydrocarbon storage fires and some specialized aviation scenarios.
This isn't a theoretical substitution. It's an industrial transition already underway at scale.
The Kitchen Counter Revolution
Walk into any fast-food restaurant in California, New York, or Washington State and the wrapper around your burger is different than it was three years ago — even if you can't tell by looking at it. PFAS were the invisible ingredient that made paper food packaging grease-resistant. Now, at least a dozen states have banned them outright.
The wave of state legislation has been swift. California's ban on PFAS in plant-fiber food packaging took effect January 1, 2023. New York banned them in paper-based packaging in December 2022. Washington followed in February 2023. Vermont, Colorado, Maryland, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Maine, Minnesota, Hawaii, and Oregon have all enacted their own bans, with effective dates ranging from 2023 to 2025. New Mexico's comprehensive HB 212, signed in 2025, adds food packaging to a broad ban taking effect in 2027. New Jersey's Protecting Against Forever Chemicals Act reaches food packaging by 2028.
By early 2026, 18 states have some form of PFAS product restriction, and the Safer States coalition tracks at least a dozen with active food-packaging-specific bans. But perhaps the most consequential action came from the federal level: in February 2024, the FDA announced that all grease-proofing agents containing PFAS were no longer being sold in the United States. In January 2025, the agency formally deemed 35 PFAS food-contact notifications "no longer effective" — bureaucratic language meaning the industry had voluntarily abandoned them.
The alternatives are surprisingly old-fashioned. Starch, cellulose, and chitosan derivatives — crosslinked or combined with plant-based waxes — provide grease and water barriers for paper and board packaging. These materials are biobased, often compostable, and increasingly cost-competitive as production scales. Some manufacturers use multilayer structures combining PLA or PHA bioplastics with nanoclay barriers to achieve oxygen and grease resistance without any fluorine chemistry at all.
The food-packaging transition shows what happens when regulation creates market certainty: once companies know the rules, they innovate fast.
The Jacket That Learned to Let Go
If food packaging was a quiet revolution, outdoor apparel has been a loud one. For years, the fluorine-carbon bond was what made a Gore-Tex jacket waterproof. The company's traditional membrane was built on expanded polytetrafluoroethylene — ePTFE — the same family of chemicals as PFAS. The durable water repellent finish applied to the jacket's exterior was also fluorinated.
In a move that reshaped the entire outdoor industry, W. L. Gore launched a PTFE-free membrane made from expanded polyethylene — marketed as ePE — explicitly positioned as PFC-free for consumer use. The membrane performs the same waterproof-breathable function without any fluorinated chemistry. Multiple apparel partners have introduced lines using the new membrane.
They're not alone. Patagonia has committed to eliminating all PFAS from its products, reporting that the majority of its line now uses PFC-free durable water repellent finishes. REI's Product Impact Standards restrict intentionally added PFAS across many textile and gear categories, with phased timelines for technical outerwear. Nike, The North Face, Mammut, Fjällräven, Columbia, Vaude, and others have announced steps to reduce or eliminate PFAS from their products.
The alternatives — silicone-based finishes, bio-based waxes, and hydrocarbon polymer coatings — don't always match the extreme oil repellency of traditional C8 fluorochemistry. But for most consumers wearing a rain jacket to walk the dog or hike a trail, the trade-off is invisible. And the brands have decided that "good enough without forever chemicals" beats "perfect with them."
Biology Joins the Fight
While industry redesigns products upstream, a parallel revolution is happening in remediation science. Enzymes — the biological catalysts that drive every living process — are being engineered to break the bonds that make PFAS "forever."
The field is early but real. Reductive dehalogenases, oxygenases, laccases, and engineered hydrolases have all shown the ability to cleave carbon-fluorine or adjacent carbon-carbon bonds in specific PFAS compounds. A 2026 review in Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology describes enzymatic PFAS degradation as "promising but limited by low catalytic efficiency, long reaction times, and narrow substrate compatibility" — honest scientific language for "it works, but we're not there yet."
At the University of Minnesota, researcher Hua Zhao is leading a project funded through the state's Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources to develop enzyme cocktails — multi-enzyme formulations designed to break down PFAS-type pesticides in surface water and agricultural runoff. The cocktails pair one enzyme targeting carbon-fluorine bonds with another targeting carbon-carbon bonds, aiming to yield fluoride ions and harmless small molecules. The project includes pilot-scale reactive biofilters using immobilized enzymes.
Companies are entering the space. BioGlobe, based in Cyprus and the UK, develops enzyme-catalyzed PFAS remediation using immobilized dehalogenases and oxidoreductases designed as modular reactors. BluumBio mines biodiversity to identify natural enzymes that can transform PFAS in environmental matrices. Allonnia builds engineered microbial consortia to break down PFAS as a pretreatment step. Cambiotics in Denmark explores bioelectrochemical systems that combine microbial metabolism with electrochemistry.
None of these have achieved full-scale commercial deployment. A 2024 review in ChemSusChem notes that "complete mineralization of long-chain PFAS has not yet been convincingly demonstrated" by enzymes alone. The most promising near-term approach is hybrid systems: physical concentration using granular activated carbon or ion exchange, followed by enzymatic or biological destruction of the concentrate. It's not a silver bullet. But it's a trajectory — one that could eventually make PFAS remediation cheaper, less energy-intensive, and more targeted than thermal incineration or supercritical water oxidation.
The Market Is Moving
The economics of PFAS replacement are no longer theoretical. The global market for fluorine-free firefighting foam is projected to reach hundreds of millions of dollars by the late 2020s, driven by aviation, petrochemical, and municipal fire services replacing existing AFFF stocks. The market for PFAS-free food packaging barrier coatings is measured in the low single-digit billions globally over the next decade. When you aggregate all PFAS-replacement chemistries — textiles, cosmetics, cookware coatings, electronics, industrial applications — analysts describe a multi-billion-dollar global market for PFAS alternatives by the early 2030s.
Maine, Minnesota, and New Mexico have passed framework-style laws that ban intentionally added PFAS across virtually all consumer products by 2030 to 2032, with staged implementation. At least seven to ten states now have comprehensive, multi-category PFAS restriction regimes. The direction is unmistakable: the regulatory floor is rising, and it's pulling industry with it.
What This Means
The story of PFAS alternatives isn't a story about sacrifice — giving up performance to avoid contamination. It's a story about ingenuity. About the Air Force proving you can fight jet-fuel fires without poisoning the base's drinking water. About Gore-Tex reinventing its signature product without the chemistry that defined it for decades. About burger wrappers that don't need forever chemicals to keep grease off your fingers.
The EPR Foundation tracks these developments because they represent the best version of environmental progress: not just cleaning up past mistakes, but designing systems that don't make them in the first place. Prevention, as the first principle of green chemistry holds, is always cheaper than cure.
PFAS won't disappear overnight. The contamination already in the ground will require decades and billions of dollars to address. But the pipeline of new contamination is being shut off — product by product, industry by industry, state by state. The forever chemicals are meeting their match not in a single breakthrough, but in a thousand quiet decisions to design something better.
The EPR Foundation publishes weekly explainers on environmental protection, restoration, and accountability. Subscribe at eprfoundation.org for updates.